Abstract:
Abstract
Writing skills into a final charge of the most important master learners. Writing skills should
be practiced and focused on higher education is to write scientific papers. In the meantime,
until now there is no learning model appropriate to write scientific papers in order to improve
the literacy skills of learners as may be necessary, especially in supporting their studies. Model
of learning to write scientific papers should encourage learners to high literacy skills are
supported by critical and creative thinking skills, and the ability to solve problems. The
purpose of this study is (1) a description keterterapan level model of multiple intelligences
oriented substantasi participation of students in the content and structure of the model
design flexibility; and (2) description of the effectiveness model of multiple intelligences
oriented learners participation resulting in an increase in learners' achievements in writing
scientific papers. The criteria used as a basis to determine the validity of the instrument is to
consider the value of lambda (λ) the provisions, if the lambda (λ)> 0.3 means the item number
to be valid. The test is done in addition to the learning model is also equipped with a
qualitative test quantitatively using equetion structural modeling (SEM) with Lisrel program.
Effectiveness of the test design used was quasi experimental method (Quasi-Experimental
design), the model Nonequivalent Control Group, carried out three times with t-test test.
Analysis of the suitability test hypothetical models parmi model evaluation with field data
based on the implementation of the test data, the results obtained following a) all seem to
have the value of the variable load factor (λ)> 0.3; b) Chi-Square = 0.61, df = 1, ρ-value = 0.43
(> 0.05); c) RMSEA of 0.00 (<0.08); and d) GFI = 0.99 (> 0.90). The results of this analysis
indicate the suitability parmi models with field data. In other words, the model is consistent
with the data, so it can be used as a model of learning to write scientific papers in college. The
average value of the critical-creative thinking skills in experiment 3 for the control group was
68.31, while the experimental group was 74.88. That is, treatment with parmi models affect
the learning process. The results of the t test = 15,066> t table = 1.98. The difference in the
average value was significant and proven to be effective in improving the ability of writing
articles.
Keywords: multiple intelligences, participatory, scientific work
